Category: Avalanche knowledge

Understanding avalanches rather than just carrying gear for them: the danger scale, the five avalanche problems, and how a forecast becomes a route.

  • The Five Avalanche Problems And What Each One Changes About Your Day

    Our guide to reading an avalanche forecast covers the structure: the danger level, the aspects, the elevation bands. This article goes one layer deeper, into the part that actually shapes your route — the avalanche problem.

    The danger level tells you how much hazard there is. The problem tells you what kind, and that is what determines where you can go and how you should behave when you get there. Two days at level 3 with different problems are two completely different days. If the levels themselves are still fuzzy, we unpacked what “considerable” really means.

    Wind slab

    What it is. Wind transports snow and deposits it as a cohesive slab, typically on lee slopes and behind terrain features.

    Why it catches people. It is often localised and often obvious in hindsight — a firmer, hollow-sounding, slightly rounded surface where softer snow should be. It forms quickly, sometimes within hours of a wind event, and it can sit next to perfectly stable snow.

    What it changes. Wind direction becomes the first question of the day. You are looking for loaded lee slopes, cross-loaded gullies and pillows behind ridgelines — and you can often ride a good day by simply avoiding the aspects that were loaded.

    Persistent slab

    What it is. A cohesive slab sitting over a weak layer that has been buried for a long time and refuses to heal.

    Why it catches people. It is the problem that defeats intuition. The snow can feel fine, the surface can behave normally, days can pass without incident — and then a slope releases on a layer that was buried weeks ago. Ski tracks on a slope prove nothing about the next person to cross it.

    What it changes. Everything. Persistent problems demand conservative terrain choices for extended periods, not just for a day, and they do not respond to the “it has been fine so far” logic that works reasonably well for other problems. This is the problem that most rewards patience.

    Wet snow

    What it is. Snow losing strength as liquid water moves through it — from warming, sun or rain.

    Why it catches people. It is a timing problem rather than a terrain problem. The same slope can be entirely reasonable in the morning and unreasonable by early afternoon.

    What it changes. The clock becomes a safety instrument. Early starts, an honest turnaround time, and paying attention to aspects as the sun moves round. If your boots are sinking in and snow is balling up, the day has moved on without you.

    Loose snow, dry and wet

    What it is. Snow without cohesion, releasing from a point and fanning out — sluff, in its dry form.

    Why it catches people. Individually smaller than slab avalanches, and easy to dismiss. The danger is usually what it does to you rather than what it is: knocking you off balance in steep terrain, carrying you over a cliff, or burying you in a terrain trap where a modest volume becomes a deep burial.

    What it changes. Sluff management on steep descents, and honest thinking about what is below you. Consequence, not size.

    Glide avalanches

    What it is. The entire snowpack sliding slowly over the ground, usually on smooth surfaces like grass or rock slabs, often marked by opening glide cracks.

    Why it catches people. They are close to unpredictable in timing. A crack can sit open for weeks and release at any moment, day or night, warm or cold.

    What it changes. Not a problem you manage with technique — you manage it with distance. Do not linger under glide cracks, and do not camp, transition or regroup beneath them.

    The point

    When you read tomorrow’s forecast, do not stop at the number. Find the problem, its aspects and its elevation band, and then ask one question: does the route I have in mind put me on that terrain?

    If it does, change the route — not your assessment of the forecast. And make sure the people you are with are carrying a shovel and probe worth having, because the plan is what keeps you off the slope and the kit is what is left if the plan fails.

  • What “Considerable” Avalanche Danger Actually Means

    Read the word “considerable” cold, without context, and it sounds like a middle setting. Three out of five. Not the extreme end, not the safe end — the sensible middle where sensible people go touring.

    That reading is wrong, and it is the single most consequential misreading in backcountry travel.

    The scale is not linear

    The five-level danger scale looks like a ruler: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. It is not one. Each step up represents a substantial jump in the likelihood of triggering an avalanche, in how widely the problem is distributed across the terrain, and in the size of what you might set off.

    Level 3 is not “halfway to the worst day of the season”. It is a day on which human-triggered avalanches are genuinely likely on the terrain the forecast describes — and it is a day that looks, from the car park, almost exactly like level 2.

    That last part is the trap. The snow does not display the danger level on its surface.

    What the scale actually describes

    The danger level is built from three things, and none of them is “how dangerous your day will be”:

    • Likelihood — how probable it is that a person triggers an avalanche.
    • Distribution — how much of the terrain carries the problem, and where.
    • Size — how big the resulting avalanche is expected to be.

    Those combine into one number for a whole region, for a whole day. Your slope is not a region. Your afternoon is not a day.

    The number is a starting point, not a verdict. It tells you what kind of day you are walking into. The avalanche problem tells you where the trouble sits and what to do about it. The terrain in front of you decides the rest. If you have not read a forecast closely before, start with the structure of one.

    What each level should change

    Rather than memorising definitions, work from what changes in your behaviour.

    Level 1 (low). Generally favourable. Isolated problems in extreme terrain. This is not a licence to stop assessing — small, localised problems still exist, and terrain traps still make small avalanches serious.

    Level 2 (moderate). The most common level across a season, and the one where complacency builds. Problems exist on specific terrain features. Careful route selection does most of the work.

    Level 3 (considerable). Human triggering is likely on the described terrain. This is the level where terrain choice stops being a preference and becomes the entire plan. Steepness, aspect, elevation, what is above you and what is below you. If you are not prepared to change your objective based on the forecast’s specific problem, this is the level where that costs people.

    Level 4 (high). Natural avalanches expected, human triggering very likely. This is a day for low-angle terrain well away from anything steeper — or for a different activity.

    Level 5 (very high). Rare. Extraordinary conditions. Not a touring day.

    Why level 3 shows up so often in accident statistics

    The uncomfortable pattern reported by avalanche services across the Alps is that a disproportionate share of fatal accidents happen at level 3. Not level 4, not level 5 — the level that sounds moderate.

    The explanation is not mysterious. Level 4 and 5 keep most people home. Level 3 does not: the weather is often good, the snow is often excellent, and the conditions look inviting. Plenty of people go out, the hazard is real, and the terrain that produces the best riding is exactly the terrain the forecast is warning about.

    Considerable is not “go with care”. It is “the forecast expects you to be able to trigger something today”.

    What to do with this

    Read the level, then immediately read past it. The number sets the tone; the avalanche problem, its aspects and its elevation bands tell you where the day’s decision-making has to happen. Plan a route you can defend against that specific problem, and pick a turnaround point before you leave the house.

    And if this article is the first time you have seen the scale explained this way, book a course. Reading about the scale and using it under pressure with a group are different skills, and only one of them can be learned from a screen. While you are checking your kit, make sure the shovel and probe are ones you would actually want to use.